HOLLIE GREIG etc.

Exposing The Hollie Greig Hoax & The Lies Of Abuse & Murder

SK-H060 – 23-12-09 – The FIRM – Elish ANGIOLINI-CLARIFICATION

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 23/12/2009

SK-H060 – 23-12-09 – The FIRM – Elish ANGIOLINI-CLARIFICATION


Much more clarification from Elish Angiolini’s staff of protectors and heavies and she will drown in distilled water.

We have yet to have clarified by her assorted goffers:

01. what happened to the original reports?
It is claimed by her office they have gone missing!

02. what happened to the original Police Report & Documentation (re: Leanne Davidson currently Police Sgt. at Fraserborough) which would seem to have gone missing, as her officers seem unable to supply this documentation.

03. what happened to the correspondence with Brian Adam MSP?
It is claimed that this letter was received though 4 months after Elish Angiolini took office.
Yet it is claimed the correspondence from & to Brian Adam MSP has gone missing!

04. what happened to the correspondence from & to Richard Lochhead MSP?
It is claimed this correspondence, subsequent to Brian Adam MSP’s, would also seem to have gone missing!

05. both Brian Adam MSP & Richard Lochhead MSP were made aware of the seemingly unlawful assault, false imprisonment and corrupt attempt to section Mrs. MacKie and the unlawful seizing and false imprisonment of Hollie MacKie as a result.
It is claimed that correspondence from both MSPs and The Crown Office has gone missing!
Astonishingly thus involving an overlap of missing correspondence from at least 3 unrelated offices!

05. We also note that Dr. Alastair Palin the medical officer for Aberdeen (& thus the Crown) would seem to have lost all his notes too and is thus consistently unable to comment as to who authorised the seemingly unlawful attempt to section Mrs. MacKie which involved a serious assault in the name of the Crown for which no documentation can be found or produced and thus the unlawfull imprisonment of Mrs. MacKie and the forced seizure and subsequent imprisonment of her daughter Hollie MacKie.

06. coincidentally it would seem that there is a serious educational problem in the whole of Scotland and a shortage of literate individuals with knowledge of the alphabet, as files seem to go missing in everyone’s offices – including those of The Lord Advocate for Scotland Elish Angiolini, The Crown Office all MSPs concerned, Doctors acting for the Crown and the police – could this be coincidental!

Had such an astonishing amount of material ‘gone missing’ from such diverse Government offices would there not have already been a public enquiry?

If this material has gone missing as claimed and there has been no public enquiry as to how and why may we humbly submit that the authorities are in indubitable breech of care of private documentation and in abrogation of their duty of care under the Data Protection Act.

Perhaps we can be advised as to why systems in Scotland would seem to be so inappropriately casual and why has there been no full enquiry?

Similarly had the material upheld Elish Angiolini’s attempts to ‘clarify’ her position and had her attempts benefitted from the paper work that is ‘claimed’ to have ‘gone missing’ would it be too synical to claim it may well have been ‘found’ and supplied.

Consider:

the Lord Advocate to make clear the following: there was no allegation of a paedophile ring contained in the police report to the Procurator Fiscal at that time; that there was no allegation about a Sheriff or a policeman in the report; that the decision not to prosecute was made before the Lord Advocate took up post as Regional Procurator Fiscal and on the basis that there was insufficient evidence in law; and that she was unaware of the claim at the time and has never had any involvement in the case.

the Lord Advocate to make clear the following:

i. there was no allegation of a paedophile ring contained in the police report to the Procurator Fiscal at that time;

Is that the claim! This is of course at variance with the record – but of course it is ‘claimed’ that records are lost at her end – fortunately we still hold copies of much of the record collated and corroborated at the time!

ii. that there was no allegation about a Sheriff or a policeman in the report;

A point which Elish Angiolini can not attest to as by her ‘claim’ the record is missing!

iii. that the decision not to prosecute was made before the Lord Advocate took up post as Regional Procurator Fiscal

Yet the correspondence of Brian Adam MSP is clearly established as 4 months AFTER the new Lord Advocate was empowered.

iv. and on the basis that there was insufficient evidence in law;

Since it is on the other hand claimed that the documentation has ‘gone missing’, the certainty of this claim seems founded on straw!

v. and that she was unaware of the claim at the time

Was Elish Angiolini unaware at the time as Procurator Fiscal or as Lord Advocate and perhaps she could explain how she is aware of this when on the other hand she makes claim that the documentation is missing – perhaps a listing of exactly what documentation she wishes to be missing could be provided and we can supply copies of the missing documentation!

vi. and has never had any involvement in the case.

Then why is she making the claims above? Seemingly claims made on hear say which is unsubstantiation by her own clearly shoddy and inadequate records.

Would it be synical of us to comment that it does seem most conveniently self serving that such a breadth of filling systems are synchronised in that which they have lost!

We feel sure that had someone of lesser stature than Elish Angiolini come to the Lord Advocate with such a fanciful selection of implausible coincidences and mutually contradictory claims the Lord Advocate would have tossed them out in short order! Silly me – to have overlooked the fact that Elish Angiolini provided this material AS Lord Advocate – presumably seeking to add gravitas to an otherwise unconvincing set of circumstances.

We must of course concur with The Firm in accepting the veracity of this fanciful construct and clearly apologise for any embarrassment her story may have caused her.

Perhaps Elish Angiolini would care, either in her private capacity, her claimed role of Procurator Fiscal or her actual status as Lord Advocate to consider beyond her possible embarrassment the very real harm done to Hollie MacKie by way of rape by her Father, her Brother, named Sheriffs, named Officers and others, not to mention her seemingly unlawful false imprisonment. Also her Mother Mrs. Anne MacKie neé Greig who has been serially abused and her word called into question without any evidence being led of its invalidity, her abuse by the Scottish Courts and financial losses thereby, as a distressed party for whom those Courts have and had a duty of care yet seemingly not only failed but serially abused further. Also her apparently unlawful assault and false imprisonment under an apparent abuse of the Mental Health Act for which we are not surprised to note the loss of the relevant documentation which it is conveniently claimed might have substantiated legitimacy.

There is also the matter of her brother who would seem to have been murdered to keep this story under wraps.

This all, of course, pales into insignificance for we must consider the possible embarrassment of Elish Angiolini and of course the possibility of embarrassment of the Lord Advoce must be considered and apologised for.

Perhaps they will now consider the embarrassment that is duely theirs as at much of the time one and the same person for their abject failure to keep care of statutory documents for which they are responsible – also the embarrassment they so rightly have at their failure to deal with the case in hand in a manner that would seem to be appropriate in the most simple of manners for a case of such gravity.

It is understood that a fundamental principle of the law is that it must be seen to be done – may I presume to point out that there is no sign of it being ‘seen’ to be done in this instance.

In the light of the serial loss of documents in her care, her seemingly mutually self contradictory claims and her apparent disregard for the position of Mrs. MacKie and her daughter Hollie whereby The Lord Advocate would seem to have dedicated much in terms of resource, time and manpower to defence of herself from embarrassment and little to acquit her duty of care – can Elish Angiolini seriously be seen as fit for the office of Lord Advocate of Scotland;
aware as I am of the irrelevance of Scotland and her office in the light of the New Constitution, downgrading Scotland to being no more than a Mikey Mouse region of The EU with no meaningful say or status.

Elish Angiolini – Clarification

23-Dec-2009

An article of 17 November reported that Anne Greig, mother of Hollie Greig – reportedly abused by an alleged paedophile ring said to include a serving Sheriff and a now deceased police officer – had called for an investigation into the role played by Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini, then a Regional Procurator Fiscal, in the decision not to prosecute.

We have been asked by the Lord Advocate to make clear the following: there was no allegation of a paedophile ring contained in the police report to the Procurator Fiscal at that time; that there was no allegation about a Sheriff or a policeman in the report; that the decision not to prosecute was made before the Lord Advocate took up post as Regional Procurator Fiscal and on the basis that there was insufficient evidence in law; and that she was unaware of the claim at the time and has never had any involvement in the case. We are happy to make the position clear and did not intend to suggest that she had acted in any way improperly.

At the time of publication, the specific details regarding the timeline of the decision not to prosecute, although requested, were not provided by the Crown Office. This information was supplied after publication. Having been furnished with the relevant information, we would like to apologise to the Lord Advocate for any distress that may have been caused.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

To View Previous Article
SKH025 – THE FIRM – 18-11-2009 – CLARIFICATION for ANGIOLINI
CLICK HERE

To View Previous Article
SK-H020 – THE FIRM – 17-11-2009 pm. ANGIOLINI STATEMENT
CLICK HERE

To View Previous Article
SK-H019 – THE FIRM – 17-11-2009 am. ANGIOLINI CHALLENGED
CLICK HERE

‘Open the curtains, throw open the windows and permit the light of investigation and fresh air into family courts and sexual, emotional and physical abuse of the vulnerable – expose the abuse & the abuse of authority of those acting in OUR name!
No child asked to be or enjoys abuse,
it is for the gratification of the inadequate
‘.

To understand the Concept & Service of StolenKids-
where you can help yourself and others at:
StolenKids-
GO TO
http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.com/

To See The Links Page
CLICK HERE
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: