HOLLIE GREIG etc.

Exposing The Hollie Greig Hoax & The Lies Of Abuse & Murder

Did Sonia Poulton Deliberately Lie for Robert Green?

Posted by Greg Lance - Watkins (Greg_L-W) on 20/12/2013

Did Sonia Poulton Deliberately Lie for Robert Green?
.
This site was first posted on on 22-Oct-2012 and material from the original
http://StolenKids-HollieGreig.blogspot.com were imported upto 03-Mar-2010.

It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the STORIES surrounding allegations of abuse of Hollie Greig are a dishonest and malicious hoax promoted by Anne Greig, Robert Green, Stuart Usher and others.

I freely admit I was conned into support of the claims, based upon lies and promises of evidence that never materialised. I apologise to anyone who may feel they have thus been defamed by my error.

For details of the background we would ask you to read the PAGE CLICK HERE

.

‘The People’s Voice’ not so much for the people 

tpvspIn her programme, ‘Sonia Poulton – Live’ on ‘The People’s Voice’ channel, she recently had a guest by the name of Robert Green who spoke about an alleged abuse case in Scotland concerning a woman with Down’s syndrome called Hollie Greig.

Up until I watched the show I knew little of the accusations, only that someone alleged that there was a paedophile ring operating in Aberdeen which allegedly involved prominent members of the community, including police, the local sheriff, social services, medical staff, and others.

Watching the programme, I noticed there seemed to be a lot of inconsistencies in what Green was saying, and he didn’t give any real evidence of his claims. Something just didn’t seem right about the overall feel of the programme, so I started to take a look on the internet to try and find a little more information.

Surprisingly, most of what I found was repetition of the same story Green had relayed on the programme, even some of the same inconsistencies. A closer look revealed that most of the information was not based on any evidence whatsoever, and some of the connections made in the case on various websites were so tenuous I could not understand how an experienced journalist could not have had some serious doubts about the case, or asked Green some very hard questions.

After all, according to the promotional material of the streaming channel it is supposed to be unbiased, give all sides a right to their say, and ask the ‘hard questions’. It seems that all of those admirable journalistic claims did not apply to this episode.

I am not going to go into detail about the case, and all I can say is look for yourself. There is far more REAL evidence to cast serious doubt on Green’s account of the story than there is REAL evidence to back up Green’s claims – it is a total sham as far as I can see.

As I was looking around, I thought I would have a look at Sonia Poulton’s Twitter feed – and there was revealed just how bias the report on her programme was.

The Twitter conversation (or whatever it is called) involved Sonia Poulton and a user called ‘Hollie Greig Hoax’ who are apparently some of the people accused by Green of being involved in the allegations of a paedophile ring.

It was certainly an interesting read. Apparently, Sonia Poulton has refused to allow the accused to reply! It sounds more like the a modern case of the Pendle Witches than fair reporting and allowing all sides to have their say. She also stated that Green has ‘incredible evidence’ – now does that mean ‘unbelievable’ and difficult to believe, or does it mean ‘marvellous’ – look up the definition .

A little further digging revealed more about how Sonia Poulton treated the ‘accused’ in this case. Apparently, after Sonia Poulton refused to engage any further in the Twitter ‘conversation’, the ‘accused’ sent her a Skype request – which she also refused. If that were not enough, apparently Sonia Poulton hung-up when she was telephoned to discuss the report and the ‘accused’ right to appear on her programme. You can read about it on the Hollie Greig Hoax website.

When I started to look into Green a little bit further, it seems he has been warned many times to stop spreading his defamatory claims, even being imprisoned for his behaviour during which he sent letters to neighbours of the 22 people he accused of being involved stating they were paedophiles. The reason he has been warned is that he has NO evidence to make such claims! Incredible that he just doesn’t get the message, and even MORE incredible that supposed journalists don’t check their information before broadcasting Green’s claims.

It seems Green only likes journalists who will buy-in to his lies.

Green approached respected BBC investigative journalist Mark Daly, who has been involved in many of the biggest journalistic exposures of corruption and child abuse in the UK.

According to Green, a programme was commissioned by the BBC and was ‘pulled’ during the last week of production. This is yet another blatant lie by Green. After looking at Green’s version of events and the so-called ‘evidence’ he gave the reporter, the BBC decided they were not interested.

In a reply to Green, Mark Daly stated “I have been involved in some of the biggest investigations into corruption, racism, murder and child sex abusers broadcast in the UK over the past ten years of my career, and the suggestion that I would be complicit in a cover up of important journalism is insulting and deeply misguided.

After careful consideration some time later (before we had filmed anything), we, the programme team, decided we couldn’t proceed with the story. It became clear that the wider allegations that were being made would be impossible to verify, and indeed we had concerns about the veracity of many of them. On that basis, we made a professional decision not to proceed. As journalists, we are not in a position to pick and choose which allegations we want to run or believe, and the vast majority of these allegations were, in our opinion, un-provable. There are few more serious allegations one can make about a person than to call them a paedophile, and for that reason, the evidence has to be of the utmost quality. And in this case, I’m afraid it fell far short of this hurdle”

There is an interesting interview with Mark Daly about Green and his claims on YouTube.

So why on earth would Sonia Poulton think that anything Robert Green had to say in his accusations was true without checking first. This man has a long history of being unreliable at the very least.

‘The People’s Voice’? I don’t think so – more like a ‘channel’ to support ridiculous and tenuous conspiracy theories bandied about by anyone.

I had though (and hoped) that ‘The People’s Voice’ was capable of delivering what it said it could, but obviously it can’t.

The programming seems to be rapidly turning into a minority channel for followers of Icke and the usual conspiracy brigade, rather than a credible source of reliable and unbiased information. It is a shame, because there are some subjects that do warrant our attention, but are mixed in with other ‘stuff’.

Mainstream media is certainly not perfect and seems biased. But at least there may be a semblance of reliable information that you can make your own mind up about through intelligent analysis and research. I can only describe ‘The People’s Voice’ as an alternative version of the same but with more sensationalism and misdirection. Perhaps that’s why some of Icke’s celebrity chums didn’t get together and finance it.

I certainly won’t be watching. I did donate in the foolish belief that this was going to be something that was really worthwhile supporting – I have since cancelled. I would rather give my cash to people I meet who deserve it rather than fund this amateurish propaganda machine.

To view the original article CLICK HERE
.

Obviously, based on factual information and provable evidence YOU must believe what you wish but without admissible evidence that Hollie Greig was ever sexually abused or any legitimate evidence that her uncle Roy Greig died in anything other than tragic circumstances committing suicide whilst drunk and under suspension from his job as subject of a police inquiry then may I suggest you do all you can to expose the lies of Robert Green, David Icke, Brian Gerrish, Matt Quinn, Belinda McKenzie, Anne Greig and the claque of criminal fools aiding them.

I freely concede I was amongst those who were fooled by the lies and not only apologised but have done as much as I can to expose those lies ever since it became clear to me that no sound evidence has ever been produced to indicate Hollie Greig was ever sexually abused nor that Roy Greig did not commit suicide.

When Robert Green & Stuart Usher printed and distributed a list of those they swore were perpetrators and victims of child abuse I misguidedly published the list on the web log which I set up and maintained for Anne Greig at the time.

I u7nreservedly apologise for my gullibility at the time and have published my apology alongside the list ever since to ensure there is absolutely no doubt that the list is a total fabrication by Anne Greig & Robert Green as published and distributed by Robert Green & Stuart Usher.

Sonia Poulton has claimed she has seen incredible evidence in support of Robert Green’s stories – I believe it is incumbent on her to publish the evidence or disambiguate the term ‘incredible’ and admit it was not credible and that she was duped, as was I, she has a duty to expose the lies and apologise for her part in promoting them.

As I have done.
.

Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

tel: 01594 – 528 337
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com
DO MAKE USE of LINKS & >Right Side Bar< & The Top Bar >PAGES<
Also:
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com

Stolen Kids Blogs with links: http://StolenKids-Bloggers.Blogspot.com

Stolen Oyster with links: http://StolenOyster-Bloggers.Blogspot.com

Stolen Trust with links: http://StolenTrust-Bloggers.Blogspot.com

Stolen Childhood with links: http://StolenChildhood-Bloggers.Blogspot.com

UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General Stuff archive: http://gl-w.blogspot.com
General Stuff ongoing: http://gl-w.com
 Health Blog.: http://GregLW.blogspot.com
TWITTER: Greg_LW

.

Advertisements

8 Responses to “Did Sonia Poulton Deliberately Lie for Robert Green?”

  1. tamoshanter said

    NO

    • Hi,

      little wonder that you are too ashamed to put your name to your unsustainable comment.

      That Sonia Poulter lied is indisputable it is merely a matter of whether she did so wittingly or unwittingly.

      It is also worth speculating as to whether she acted for Robert Green or out of gullibility.

      Clearly, as someone who claims to be a professional journalist her investigative skills are clearly inept and unprofessional.

      Should you wish to try to substantiate your foolish interjection you are welcome but with zero admissible evidence proffered to support your claim it would be apposite for you to have the integrity to back your claims with your identity, that is if you want your claims published.

      Regards,
      Greg_L-W.

  2. tamoshanter said

    Clearly, as someone who claims to be a professional journalist her investigative skills are clearly inept and unprofessional.

    this from the seasoned blogger who was duped by a mad woman and a travel agent 🙂

    • Hi,

      it would take a coward too ashamed to put their name to their comment to make such a silly comment.

      You might care to check out the fact that journalism is a paid position whereas my blogging was both amateur and well intentioned and the stage at which I was duped was when first I started blogging – yes I was far too trusting and was unaware of the ease with which facts and identities could be checked out.

      Yes indeed the main promoter of the Hollie Greig hoax was very devious and increasingly displayed her mental instability whilst her co-conspirator was retired and claimed to be a broadcaster and implied he was a qualified investigator – both of which transpired to be lies.

      At least I can with dignity admit to my mistakes and do so ethically using my own name unlike the low lifes who so frequently shelter in anonimity and multiple identities.

      I note your inability to support your earlier crass comment.

      Regards,
      Greg_L-W.

      • alibongo said

        THE FACTS speak for themselves.

        You continue to name the poor people ,justify that

        • Hi,

          it is interesting to note that you are either uncertain of your comments or lack the ethics to back them with your identity – and wisely so I would opine.

          Indeed the FACTS speak for themselves and those facts are that there is absolutely zero admissible evidence to support the stories that have been fabricated with regard to Hollie Greig and the suicide of her uncle Roy Greig.

          Again and again those exploiting Hollie Greig, like Anne Greig, Robert Green, Belinda McKenzie and others of their vile and dishonest cabal drag out the same ‘opinions’ quoted out of context and distortions of fact but never once have they produced a convincing piece of legally admissible evidence to uphold their ‘stories’ NOT ONCE.

          So indeed let us be led by the FACTS.

          As to my having republished the list of claimed abusers for which I have consistently and publicly appologised, I am pleased that the cowardly commenter accepts that they are ‘poor people, for having been falsely named by Anne Greig, Robert Green and Stuart Usher, in a manner which foolishy duped me into belief in their lies for a short time (mea culpa).

          Perhaps the commenter would have the courage and integrity to put his name to his realisation the facts clearly show the named individuals were innocent of the false allegations made against them and ensure that he makes the effort to publicise these FACTS on other blogs and facebook entries, you tube and web sites where the lies of Robert Green, Anne MacKie (Greig), Belinda McKenzie and their fellow travellers publish their hoax, defamation and bile.

          Regards,
          Greg_L-W.

          • Tommygeorge said

            Why would my putting my name change the morality of your act

          • Hi,

            your motivation for your posturing comments and lack of contribution to the body of facts might become apparent were you to cease your dishonest and cowardly sheltering behind a false identity.

            My motivation and actions are not open to question by liars, cheats, cowards and charlatans and other similar low lifes.

            Regards,
            Greg_L-W.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: